Increases in the cost of childcare

The cost of bringing up a child has reached £227,266, up from £222,458 last year, with the first year of a child’s life seeing the largest increase.

According to the annual ‘Cost of a Child’ report from protection specialist LV=, the cost of a child’s first year has risen by 50% (£11,025 up from £7,372) since the first report in 2003. In the past 12 months, it has increased by 5% and this is largely due to the cost of childcare for children aged less than a year (1) rising by 7% (£6,623 up from £6,191 in 2013). In total, parents now spend £66,113 on childcare – an increase of 4% overall.

Education and childcare remain the biggest costs, and 71% of parents report that they have been forced to make cuts to meet the financial demands of raising their family. The overall cost of raising a child has increased by 62% since 2003.

The cost of living
Parents have been hit hard by increases in the cost of living, as more of their income is spent on essential goods and services such as rent, household bills and food – items that have seen particularly rapid inflation over the past few years (2). The overall cost of goods and services purchased by parents has increased by 33.6% in 10 years, compared with 30.7% for the headline consumer price index, meaning that prices have been rising almost 10% faster for parents (3) than the general inflation rate. Single parent’s families have been hit even harder with the overall cost of goods increasing by 34.7% over the same period. This comes at a time when many benefits have been put on hold and wages have not kept up with inflation.
The increasing cost of raising a child means that parents are now estimated to be spending on average more than a quarter (4) (28%) of their annual income on bringing up their child each year – up from 23% in 2004. For single parent families, this figure rises to more than half (54%) (5) of their annual income.

Working more hours
Alongside the rising cost of raising a family, the changes to Child Benefit in January 2013—which saw many families lose some or all of their child benefit—have affected many households. One in four mums (27%) have returned to work earlier than they wanted to and close to one in five (19%) have had to work more hours than they intended to. Meanwhile, one in ten parents (11%) have now chosen to have a smaller family, and one in five (21%) are delaying having an additional child because they now can’t afford it.

However, with the cost of average childcare costing £405 (6) a month across Britain, mums now say they personally need to earn an average of over £26,000 a year to make it worthwhile returning to work.

Protecting the family finances
The need to make the family finances go further has taken its toll on the amount parents are likely to put aside for the future. One in three (34%) say they’ve had to reduce the amount they save, and one in 10 (10%) have had to cancel or review their insurance products and income protection cover to help with family budgeting. In fact, 41% of parents now have no life cover, critical illness or income protection cover at all.

Source:

Cost of a child calculations, from birth to 21 years, have been compiled by the Centre of Economic and Business Research (CEBR) for LV= in December 2013 and is based on the cost for the 21 year period to December 2013. Using data from the ONS’ Family Expenditure Survey, CEBR also were also able to compile a measure of inflation for families, in contrast with the overall CPI measure.

Additional research was conducted by Opinium Research from 13 to 16 December 2013. The total sample size was 2,001 UK adults and was conducted online. Results have been weighted to a nationally representative criteria.

1. CEBR’s model assumes that parents go back to work after 6 months (what’s known as “ordinary maternity leave”). It then tracks the cost of childcare for the remaining 6 months of the first year, using a combination of data from the Office for National Statistics and desk research from other sources. This cost has increased significantly over the past 12 months.
2. Calculated as December 2013 versus December 2003. Single parent households on average have significantly lower income than two parent households [£19,444 for the average single parent household, versus £38,762 for the overall UK average household and £52,140 for two parent households]. This means that a much greater share of expenditure is made on essential items such as rent, household utility bills, and food. It is these products that have seen particularly rapid inflation over the past few years [e.g. the December 2013 inflation figures showed a 3.7% annual increase in the cost of rent and utilities], whereas prices on more luxury items such as recreation & culture have seen smaller increases [the same figures showed just a 0.8% annual increase in the cost of recreation and culture]. As such, the total basket of goods and services purchased by these single parent households has seen faster price inflation than the basket of those bought by two parent families.

3. Family households spend a much greater share of expenditure on essential items such as rent, household utility bills, and food. It is these products that have seen particularly rapid inflation over the past few years.

4. According to CEBR, the cost of raising a child from birth to 21 now costs £227,266 or £10,822 per year. The average (mean) annual household gross income is £38,762. This equates to 28% of the average income spent per year on bringing up a child i.e. £227,266 divided by 21 = £10,822. 100 divided by £38,762 x £10,822 = 28%. In 2003 this was just 23% (in 2003 the cost of raising a child was £140,398 or £6,686 per year. The average mean annual household income was £29,406 so £140,398 divided by 21 = £6,686. 100 divided by £29,406 x £6,686 = 23%).

5. Due to the lower income of single parent families, the average annual cost of raising a child is equivalent to 54% of average gross annual income of £20,000.

6. According to DayCareTrust the average cost of childcare across Britain is £101.29 per week (for 25 hours) x 4 = £405.16. (Child Care Costs Survey 2013, page 4)

The changing nature of retirement

When you want to access your pension pot, you have several choices. The right choice for you will depend on a number of different elements, such as your tax position, whether you have a partner, your attitude to risk and even your health.

On reaching retirement, you can buy an annuity to turn your pension into an income. However, the changing nature of retirement means that you may work part-time or stagger your entry into full retirement, so alternatives such as an income drawdown policy may be appropriate for your retirement income and lifestyle needs.

Government review of the rules
If you decide that the most appropriate option for your particular situation is to go down the income drawdown route, you may now receive more from your pension and could benefit from a recent government review of the rules (April 2013). Drawdown is one alternative to purchasing an annuity to provide pension income. It can offer flexibility and the potential to benefit from investment growth, but you need to be comfortable with some stock market risk.

With drawdown, you have a pot of money which is used to generate your income. To help ensure that your money will always provide you with an income, the Government has set rules on how much you can take each year. However, despite this, you can still end up with less income than what you can get from an annuity.

Pensioners keep their pension invested
Drawdown allows pensioners to keep their pension invested and take an income from it each year. The amount of income that can be taken from a capped drawdown policy is based on calculations made by the Government Actuary’s Department (GAD). These are known as the GAD rates, and they follow annuity rates and yields on government bonds or gilts. The income taken can currently be 120% of the GAD rate each year. Because your money is still invested, you are still taking risk with your money, and this includes your income.

Flexible drawdown allows unlimited income to be taken (subject to income tax), but retirees must have another pension income of at least £20,000 a year to rely on, made up of workplace pension, a state pension or a mixture – this is known as the minimum income requirement.

This is because your pension is still invested when it is in drawdown so is at risk of stock market fluctuations. The Government doesn’t want you to fall into poverty and subsequently become reliant on the state.

Running out of money
The Government requires you to re-check your maximum income every three years (and yearly if you are aged 75 or older). If investment performance has been poor or you have taken out a lot of money, then you will have less income to take out in the future.

The government rules are intended to ensure that you don’t run out of money. If investment performance has been good, or you haven’t taken out too much money, your maximum withdrawals could increase. This would give you even more flexibility. However, if investment performance has been poor or you’ve withdrawn the maximum allowed, your withdrawals may decrease.

You don’t have to wait for three years until your next review. You can choose to review your income every year. So if your fund value does increase, then you can benefit from this quickly. It’s up to you.

Impact of announced changes
The gilt yield used in the income calculation has increased to 3.25%, which takes account of the impact of a change which happened in 2013. Last year, the maximum withdrawal limit was also increased from 100% to 120%. So taking these two changes together means that your maximum income could be 33% more if you chose drawdown now as opposed to 12 months ago.

But if you are already in drawdown on the lower 100% income maximum, then it is possible that you could increase your income withdrawals to the new maximum level, including taking account of the change to the gilt yield, but before you do this please seek professional advice.

The value of an investment can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may get back less than you put in. Taking maximum income every year will increase your chance of reduced income in the future.

Information is based on our current understanding of taxation legislation and regulations. Any levels and bases of, and reliefs from taxation, are subject to change. Tax treatment is based on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future.

Pensions lifetime allowance changes on the horizon

It is estimated that potentially over 360,000[1] people could be affected by the new pensions lifetime allowance (LTA) changes, according to HM Revenue & Customs (20 March 2013). If you are one of these people, you will need to act fast, and we recommend that you contact us immediately or you could miss out on the opportunity to protect yourself from an unnecessary tax charge.

The LTA will reduce from £1.5m to £1.25m on 6 April 2014, so you now have a matter of weeks to make a decision. It applies to an individual’s total pension worth. If applicable to you, there is a real need to act quickly and gather details of current values and growth projections for any private pensions, including self-invested personal pensions, as well as any workplace money purchase or defined benefit schemes.

Calculations by Standard Life show that due to investment growth, an individual ten years from retirement with accumulative pension savings of around £700,000[2] or a final salary pension income of around £60,000 could be at risk of breaching the £1.25m LTA.

Pension savers who don’t check to see if they will be affected and who exceed the new LTA will expose up to £250,000 of their pension savings to a 55% tax charge – leading to an unexpected tax bill of up to £137,500 (this is based on the difference between the current and new LTAs) which could potentially be avoided if professional advice is taken now.

Salary earners most likely to be impacted by the change 
Research by YouGov, on behalf of Standard Life, shows less than a fifth (19%) of people know what the LTA is, and only 31%
of people earning more than £50,000 – the salary earners most likely to be impacted by the change – are aware of it.
Research for the Department of Work and Pensions shows that an individual will work for an average 11 employers[3] during their lifetime, which means some people are likely to have accumulated many different pensions over the course of their careers, making it more difficult to get a clear view of their overall pension fund value.

Source:
[1] www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget2013/tiin-1046.pdf
[2] Someone ten years from retirement with multiple pension pots worth around £700,000 could exceed their allowance if their pot grows at 7% a year, which includes a 1% charge – even if they stop paying into it now.
[3] www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/220405/small-pension-pots-consultation.pdf The information in this article is based on our understanding in February 2014. Your personal circumstances also have an impact on tax treatment.

Tax treatment is based on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future.